DentaLoft
Under our open methodology this clinic scored 36.7/100 for the evidence-supported burden of complaints, transparency, credentials and reputation. Istanbul, Turkey.
Rank #139 of 206 · Last checked 2026-07-13 · Methodology v1.1 · Confidence D
Assessed from 60 public reviews (0 Trustpilot · 60 Google)
Clinical accuracy reviewed by Dr Mariano Eduardo Balabanian Galeano · GDC 204540 · verifiable at olr.gdc-uk.org
Who this clinic is
We show what a clinic states versus what is independently verified. Registry checks (Ministry of Health / HealthTürkiye / dental council) are performed by our editors — items marked "pending" have not yet been independently verified.
DentaLoft is a dental clinic in Turkey offering a range of treatments including implants, cosmetic dentistry, and orthodontics. The website is available in multiple languages and lists a team of dentists, but lacks pricing information and a physical address.
- + Multilingual website (English, Russian, Turkish)
- + Detailed list of services and specialties
- + Patient testimonials included
- + Team of dentists named with some specializations
- − No prices or ranges published
- − No physical address or map
- − No operating licence or professional registration details
- − No aftercare instructions or cross-border procedures
13 qualified complaint incidents
2 serious (S3) · 0 critical (S4). Classified from third-party negative reviews under methodology v1.0 (automated draft, pending editorial sign-off).
The patient reported an unhelpful receptionist who tried to make them leave immediately upon arrival.
The patient reported that the dentist stopped a procedure on a child midway and spoke rudely, refusing to continue.
The patient reported being charged 500 TL for an examination, which they considered excessive and led to a negative recommendation.
The patient reported dental implant crowns that fell off within a year and the clinic demanding extra money for correction despite a two-year guarantee.
The patient reported that the clinic cancelled a pre-booked appointment for a toothache and rescheduled it a week later, leaving them with swelling and pain.
The patient reported a scheduling error and lack of appointment confirmation by the receptionist, causing inconvenience.
The patient reported being charged for X-ray and examination, then an additional fee to receive the X-ray results, describing the pricing as deceptive.
The patient reported being denied a discount on a specialist consultation and felt dismissed by staff, leading to cancellation of the appointment.
The patient reported a tooth restoration that broke after 5 months, alleging substandard materials.
The patient reported being charged for an examination without an x-ray at each visit, which they considered unreasonable.
The patient reported difficulty scheduling an appointment for their son's loose tooth due to the receptionist's refusal, despite the dentist's instruction to return if problems arose.
The patient reported being charged for an X-ray after a tooth extraction and expressed dissatisfaction with the clinic.
The patient reported a painful dental cleaning that caused persistent toothache and sensitivity for months, with food impaction and inadequate explanation from the clinic.
Every criterion is scored from public sources. ✓ verified · ✗ not found · ◐ partial · ? unverified (scores 0, not a negative finding).
Reported separately — not in the editorial score
Search and AI discoverability measures SEO, not safety or treatment quality, so it does not affect a clinic's rank. We publish it for transparency only.
Clinic operating licence: not published on the clinic website
| Dentist | Specialisation | Licence no. |
|---|---|---|
| Dt. Furkan Çelik | — | not published |
| Dt. İsmail Kaya | — | not published |
| Dt. Mahmut Emrah Sütcü | — | not published |
| Uzm. Dt. Tuğba Zengin Çelik | Uzm. (Specialist) | not published |
| Dt. Özkan Keskin | — | not published |
| Dr. Dt. Caner Balta | Dr. (Doctor) | not published |
| Dt. Emrah Coşkunlu | — | not published |
Unverified items score 0 but are not treated as negative findings. If you can document any, please send a correction.
- · Healthcare facility operating licence (verifiable)
- · International Health Tourism authorisation (where marketed to intl patients)
- · Treating dentists’ professional registrations independently verifiable
- · On-site dental imaging / CBCT
- · Surgical treatment capability
- · Emergency-response arrangements
- · Written English aftercare instructions
- · Complete patient-record / documentation handover
- · Cross-border complication / remedy procedure
- · Bayesian-adjusted rating (prior 4.0, weight 25)
- · Review recency & continuity
- · Substantive responses to reviews
- · Structured data on the site
- · Accessible machine-readable clinic identity
For identification only; may change — verify with the clinic directly.
Where the reviews come from
| Platform | Reviews assessed | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot | 0 | 2026-07-13 |
| 60 | 2026-07-13 |
Ratings are Bayesian-adjusted so a handful of five-star reviews cannot outweigh a documented complaint record. Negative reviews are classified as incidents in Complaint & Safety and are not deducted again here.
What we could and couldn’t confirm
- ✓ Working website
- ✓ Dentists named
- ✓ Service list published
- ✓ Clear contact details
- ✓ English-language site
- ✓ English spoken
- ✓ International-patient coordination
- ◐ Dentist specialisations listed
- ◐ Documented sterilisation / hygiene protocol
- ◐ Review authenticity & platform diversity
- ◐ Usable messaging / WhatsApp channel
- ? Address & map published
- ? Prices or ranges published
- ? Implant price listed
- ? Crown price listed
- ? Consultation price listed
- ? Healthcare facility operating licence (verifiable)
- ? International Health Tourism authorisation (where marketed to intl patients)
- ? Treating dentists’ professional registrations independently verifiable
- ? On-site dental imaging / CBCT
- ? Surgical treatment capability
Registry-level verification (Ministry of Health, HealthTürkiye, dental council, university records) is performed by our editors; items above reflect what is observable from public sources at the last check.
What the clinic has said
Editorial verification pending. This clinic has not yet been contacted for right of reply on this automated draft. Clinics may correct facts, supply their authorisation, warranty and registration documents, and respond to any complaint before it is finalised; a response can change the score but cannot remove a documented complaint or buy a rank. Any response and its effect on the score will be recorded here and in the change history.
- 2026-07-13 — Automated data collection & scoring under methodology v1.1 (editorial draft).
Anyone — including DentaLoft — can ask us to (re-)audit this clinic. This notifies our editors; they perform the review by hand against public evidence and record any score change in the public change log. It is free, applied the same way to every clinic, and payment never affects the outcome.
Corrections are reviewed against sources and applied with a public change-history entry. Report an error →